Imagine you're writing your team's policy for AI-assisted development. What goes in it?
A strong answer designs real policy, ownership, gates, and disclosure, and can defend it against a ban on one side and a free-for-all on the other
The policy I'd write is basically, assistants are allowed and honestly encouraged, but the engineer is fully responsible for anything they submit. The AI wrote it is never an excuse. All code goes through the same review process regardless of where it came from, though reviewers should know when a change is heavily AI-generated so they can review accordingly. Nothing sensitive goes into prompts, so no secrets, no customer data, and only approved tools with the right data-handling agreements in place. Tests and CI checks apply to everything equally. And for the genuinely sensitive areas like security and payments, a senior engineer stays closely involved rather than leaving the work to generation. It mostly boils down to one idea, I think. Use the productivity, and keep the accountability with humans.